"Collecting Incunabula: Enlightenment, revolution and the market"
Kristian Jensen, British Library 

• 
  Introduction
• 
  Incunabula and freedom
• 
  ‘May the god of Gold be with you’
• 
  Old books and new luxury : identifying incunabula in the market
• 
  ‘The superiority which books give better than horses’ : Incunabula and authority
• 
  ‘Old books, very displeasing to the eye’: Re-creation and oblivion

During the eighteenth century the past was radically reassessed in order to understand and to influence changing political and social structures. The consequences of the invention of printing, long celebrated as a crucial event in European history, were rethought in the light of contemporary concerns: as a result opinions were polarised.

As books from the earliest years of printing were increasingly investigated as physical evidence of the invention, categories of books previously neglected became very expensive indeed. This changed the relationship between scholars, craftsmen, traders, collectors and institutions, who all now had a claim to be taken seriously when speaking about books. This new multipolarity was a challenge to the authority of those institutions or groups which felt that it was their privilege to assess books, to judge them good or bad.

Gratianus, Decretum. Strasbourg: Heinrich Eggestein, 1471.
Bodleian Library, Auct. 4Q 1.7.

The way in which early Strasbourg books had been produced was central for the discussion of where and when printing was invented. Historians analysed surviving documents, but their answer was contested by others, who used a method based on the book as an object.

The lectures explore and compare reactions in the two leading centres of the market for early books, Paris and London. Although the market for a new-found luxury was remarkably unified, different mechanisms for social control in each centre meant that tensions were addressed differently.

Considering the political and commercial impact of the French Revolution on these two centres, the lectures underline the complex interplay between politics, the marketplace, and cultural values. It was in this period that books from the fifteenth century emerged as a coherent, marketable commodity, as incunabula. This depended on a new, systematic discipline, created outside universities and academies, which saw books as physical, not textual, evidence of the past.

We will investigate parallels with the development of art history and the art market. As fifteenth-century books became incunabula, they were required to fulfil the expectations of their new owners, not only as texts, but especially as objects whose fate was to be physically transformed.

The lectures rely on unpublished evidence from archives in Britain and France, correspondence between dealers, collectors, librarians, and scholars, on extensive information about prices and price developments, and on a wide range of eighteenth-century published works, from political, philosophical and historical studies, to novels and drinking songs.

Visual information provided by the books themselves is located in the broader context of eighteenth-century aesthetics. Needless to say, the lectures engage with modern historiographical debates, and benefit from the work of many distinguished predecessors.

Johannes Salesberiensis: Polycraticus sive De nugis curialium. Brussels: Fratres Vitae Communis, [1479-81].
Bodleian Library, Douce 192

About 1800 Francis Douce rejected the medieval binding of this book for a plain contemporary one.